Comparing Cylindrical Cells with Prismatic Pouch Cells
The Difference Between Prismatic Pouches & Cylindrical Cells2020-07-26T22:54:34-07:00

Project Description

The Difference Between Prismatic Pouches & Cylindrical Cells

With the advent of electric cars, more accessible and affordable solar power, plus a variety of digital tools for off-grid living, the importance of reliable and innovative battery technology is higher than it’s ever been. Storing and distributing power is the backbone of all these technologies, after all.

In this article, we’ll take a look at the core differences between cylindrical, prismatic and pouch cells for batteries to understand how they interact with other tools and devices. Review a comparison of cylindrical cells with prismatic pouch cells, looking at the pros and cons of each type of battery packaging style, and learn some of the industrial uses that each kind of cell is best suited for.

Cylindrical vs. Prismatic vs. Pouch Cells

For anyone interested in the basic differences among cylindrical, prismatic and pouch cells, here’s a general breakdown of how and why these different battery packaging designs were created.

  • Cylindrical Cells

Tubular-shaped lithium-ion or nickel-based cylindrical cells number among the most popular batteries in use today. Their popularity stems from the fact that cylindrical cells are inexpensive to produce, widespread, stable, safe to use and can be applied uniformly across a variety of industries (i.e. they aren’t manufacturer-specific in shape and design).

Cylindrical lithium cells, which come with a very manageable watt-per-hour price, are a mainstay for portable gadgets and mobile tech.

It’s probably a good idea to note that the electric car manufacturer Tesla has (literally) fueled the demand for cylindrical cells (18650 and the slightly larger 21700 cells). This demand is based on the company’s 2008 decision to use cylindrical cells instead of specially designed prismatic or pouch cells. That being said, Tesla isn’t 100% averse to using other types of batteries, as is the case for Tesla Model 3s made in China.

  • Prismatic Cells

Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery prismatic cells are thinner and lighter than cylindrical cells. These cells, coming in rectangular aluminum or steel casing (“cans” that increase stability), have fairly long lifespans but aren’t as easy to keep cool compared to their cylindrical counterparts.

Prismatic cells, while thin and light, don’t come in a uniform, standard design. This fact means they can be quite costly to manufacture, coming with a higher watt-per-hour price point. Yet the prismatic cells’ variable shapes and sizes offer engineers more design flexibility, the ability to layer them (thanks to their rectangular shape) and they can limit the amount of valuable space they take up in products like mobile phones and tablets.

One disadvantage of prismatic cells is that if an issue arises with any one cell in a battery pack (likely due to thermal management difficulties), the entire pack will be in trouble. Cylindrical cells offer more robust thermal management.

  • Pouch Cells

When comparing pouch cells with prismatic cells, one of the main differences to pay attention to is the lack of aluminum or steel casing. Instead, soft-pack pouch-cell lithium batteries are enclosed in a soft polymer aluminum plastic film or shell, which makes them very lightweight.

Lithium-polymer batteries (LiPo) make use of a polymer electrolyte rather than a liquid electrolyte. These batteries are increasingly popular with smartphone manufacturers. Their soft lightweight design also offers more safety measures than hard metal casings. When a critical issue with a pouch cell occurs – often due to internal pressure overheating or shortening the batteries – the pack will noticeably expand with gas. But the oversized pack won’t explode, which can happen with a hard aluminum or steel case.

High energy density pouch cells, due to their custom-built nature, light packaging, reliability and small size are well-suited for automotive use, radio-controlled aircraft and cars, drones and ultra-thin laptops.

Additionally, pouch cells also used in technologies where weight and safety are an issue but a decent cycle life (how many times a battery or battery pack can be charged before it dies) and high energy density are also desired. Still, be aware that pouch cells cost more than lithium-ion batteries and often come with slightly less storage power, plus a shorter lifespan.

Comparing Cylindrical Cells with Prismatic Batteries and Pouch Cells

Now that you have some idea about the technology behind these different types of battery packaging, let’s dive a little deeper into a comparison between cylindrical cells, prismatic batteries and pouch cells.

Here are some of the main pros and cons you should look for when thinking about cylindrical vs. pouch cells – but of course, the type of cell you ultimately choose will depend on the type of application you need it for.

  1. Cylindrical cells, due to their widespread and standardized use, offer a more robust automation process and better manufacturing techniques (providing a more consistent product) than pouch cells.
  2. Prismatic pouch cells are sensitive to deformation in high-pressure environments, whereas cylindrical cells handle high internal pressures much better and without deforming.
  3. Cylindrical lithium battery electrodes are easier to weld when compared with lithium polymer pouch cells or prismatic cells.
  4. Pouch cells, while lightweight, are vulnerable to damage stemming from humidity and high temperatures. This can reduce their lifespans and increasing their overall cost because they’ll need to be replaced more often.
  5. If a single cylindrical battery goes bad, the impact on the entire pack is relatively low. But with prismatic cells, if one battery goes bad, it can then compromise the entire pack.
  6. Cylindrical cells are stable, inexpensive, standardized across industries and last a long time (thanks to a better cycling). Prismatic cells and pouch cells are not standardized across industries, which make them more expensive to produce. That said, their rectangular shapes utilize limited space better, and those with hard shells can be stacked. In most cases, softer pouch cells should not be stacked.
  7. Cylindrical batteries radiate heat and control temperature more effectively when compared to prismatic batteries. Prismatic batteries die faster due to less effective thermal management.
  8. The chemical activity at the edges and corners of prismatic batteries is rather poor. The less-than-optimal chemical activity of prismatic batteries means their performance decreases substantially after long-term use. Cylindrical batteries have a much longer lifespan compared to prismatic batteries.

Cylindrical cells, along with prismatic and pouch cells, all come with different advantages and disadvantages depending on their intended use. As battery packaging technologies change and continue to improve (e.g., removing rare and expensive cobalt from lithium-ion battery designs), these advantages and disadvantages will likely change as well.

Project Details